Summary Statistics

  • 2020 Total Originations: $2.0B
  • Originations ITD: $6.2B
  • Total Active Loans as of Mar 2020: $649M
  • Reached $1B+ in Active Loans on Feb 14, 2020

Robust Growth – Major $1B Milestone

Genesis had its largest quarter ever in its digital asset lending business in Q1. We added more than $2B in new originations, doubling the previous record of $1B set last quarter, and up 354% from the same quarter last year. Active Loans Outstanding touched $1B in mid-February before settling to $649M at the end of the quarter. Active Loans were up ~20% from the previous quarter despite a 50% intraday drawdown in the price of BTC in mid-March.

Cumulative originations increased 46.6% from the prior quarter, marking an eighth consecutive quarter of strong growth and bringing total originations to nearly $6.2B since we launched the lending business in March 2018. Our loan portfolio substantially increased in value through increased cash and bitcoin loan issuance, offset by a decrease in the notional value of crypto loans outstanding.

Q1 2020 Asset Composition

Despite increasing the last three quarters, cash loan composition fell in the first quarter of 2020. This decrease came mostly in the last two weeks of March amid the broad market selloff and significant deleveraging which we’ll discuss more in depth later. BTC and cash lending still dominated the loan portfolio comprising 81.4% of the value. The infrastructure, maturity and general interest in BTC/USD markets relative to altcoin/USD markets is much greater and we don’t see that trend redirecting anytime soon.

An Update on Our Portfolio and Position within the Market

We feel incredibly proud of our team’s performance and strength over the last quarter, and specifically through the challenges presented by COVID-19. Despite being in the epicenter of the global pandemic and experiencing first-hand the volatility and unpredictability of the market, we have never felt better about our business and our leading position within the digital asset lending space.

In Q1 we reached an incredible milestone of $1B in active loans outstanding while experiencing no defaults, capital losses or delinquencies at any point over the period. We continue to provide robust financing and consistent yield to some of the largest investors within this asset class.

Despite being forced to operate remotely, we’ve strengthened our communication firmwide, hired across engineering, sales and operations, increased international activity, and strengthened our balance sheet through continued reinvestment in our business. We have the utmost appreciation for all our clients and employees who have allowed us to be in this position of strength.

Despite some of the challenges COVID-19 has presented, we have extracted a ton of value from this period. Global market uncertainty along with intense volatility in mid-March acted as a natural stress test on Genesis and the crypto market at large. We think these are the best times to evaluate areas for additional investment and ultimately find solutions to have a stronger operation moving forward. While we can proudly say we passed this stress test, we think there is a lot of insight we can share with our clients and counterparties.

We’re going to provide an intimate glimpse into what our desk experienced on March 12th. What did lending and borrowing look like during the 50% intraday drawdown? What observations did we make about exchange activity? What did margin calling look like? How did we manage our treasury and fund flows? Before we bring you courtside, we’d like to first touch on some key decisions we made as a firm to help us work through this period.

Risk Management Approach – Holistic, Dynamic and Adaptive

We’ve been relatively vocal about how we manage risk, so we’d like to take this time to clarify our framework and some of the decisions we made through this period of intense volatility. We believe our approach to managing risk is one of the key reasons we’ve been able to find success in this industry and is something we take pride in addressing with our network of lenders.

Institutional Risk Framework

Because we are an institutional lender, our loan portfolio is comprised of the leading hedge funds, trading firms, miners, and corporations in the industry. We distinguish ourselves from other crypto lenders by being able to understand our clients’ needs at the most granular level – What are they trying to accomplish? What strategies are they running? What instruments are they trading? What does their delta exposure look like? How do they think about security and risk management? We spend a lot of time addressing these issues with our clients to both service their bespoke needs and manage our risk levels.

We don’t have a cookie-cutter approach to mitigating risk, but rather look at risk specific to each of our relationships and then again at the portfolio level. We have many levers to pull to ensure Genesis is well protected, including collateral, calculated exposure limits based on quantitative and qualitative due-diligence, margin management, ongoing transparency and health updates, and macro hedging tools. Our risk system works around the clock to monitor our exposure and the health of our portfolio. Our ability to responsibly manage risk and face zero defaults through one of the most volatile days in bitcoin’s history highlights the strength of our methodology. We believe our framework sets us up for continued success and gives us the flexibility to make smart decisions even in a turbulent market.

Dynamic Credit Extension

As we mentioned previously, Genesis doesn’t manage risk using a cookie-cutter approach. We do not have pre-set LTVs and do not extend credit unless we believe it’s rightfully earned and appropriate within the context of the relationship, trade, and time of issuance. To avoid any confusion, we refer to credit as the extension of financing based on the capitalization and financial strength of the counterparty rather than the asset that counterparty pledges as collateral.

Aside from credit extension, Genesis primarily lends on an “over-collateralized” basis – i.e., the collateral pledged exceeds the value of the loan. There is a difference between extending a loan and extending credit. Loans can be backed by either collateral assets or by credit.

We noticed some market confusion around Genesis’ lending appetite during the most recent period of volatility. At no point did Genesis stop making loans, but we did take a more conservative approach to credit extension during this period. We wound up originating a significant portion of the entire quarter’s loans during the month of March and never once paused lending activity.

Our conservative approach followed the principles of our Risk Framework. The time a loan is made is a significant component in the risk framework, and we felt that this time in global markets was a major black swan event. We concluded that the general assumptions we make in normal market conditions didn’t quite apply, and so the time element of our credit formula wasn’t in harmony with the other components. Over-collateralized loan demand was strong during this period, which reaffirmed our decision to tighten credit.

A Timeline of Events (Through our eyes)

Q1 was an eventful period for markets. In January 2020, Bitcoin was coming off a solid 2019 with about a 100% year-over-year return. As the price rallied into February past $10k, forward curves were extremely steep, with March futures implying over a 30% annualized return. The timeline of events that occurred from this point through the end of the quarter tell a story full of highs and lows.

Feb 14: Market Apex

BTC is holding strong above $10k and our loan book just crossed $1 billion in active loans outstanding. This was a huge milestone for our team and a testament to two years of incredible support from clients.

Mar 3:  Building towards The Great Deleveraging

A trend we noticed throughout the quarter was leverage building in the derivatives market. The main driver of that leverage was the lucrative short basis trade to March expiry.

  • The basis trade is supported by lenders issuing cash loans collateralized in crypto so borrowers can take that cash inventory to derivatives exchanges, purchase spot, and sell futures.

Trading desks can get leverage with minimal capital requirements on both spot and futures. On the spot side, if we lend assets that are used to trade immediately after the borrow is secured, we can simply keep the proceeds generated from the trade as collateral and require borrowers to top-up incremental margin. Effectively they can get spot long and short exposure without tying up the capital required to trade the entirety of spot. On the futures side, exchanges can offer similar. On either leg, credit can also be issued, further reducing the capital outlay. In a contango regime, most of the short open-interest on futures is leveraged “smart” money betting on the normalization of forward curves.

That begs the question, who is buying against the trading firms in futures during a contango regime? Our hypothesis is most of that bid is bullish traders avoiding the perpetual funding rate, leveraging long using futures instead of perpetual swaps as well as a portion from OTC firms who sold BTC spot at a premium and are hedging with futures. In both cases, the flow that ultimately leads to the bid in futures during contango is speculative while the opposing flow is arbitrage. The level of contango represents the magnitude of speculation, so when the implied annualized return is sustained at 30% ann. despite arbitrage traders piling in short basis, the speculators are on aggregate outpacing the arbitrage flow.

This positioning in the market implies that when basis contracts, the market should expect a large influx of cash and deficit of BTC from the perspective of lenders and OTC desks since as traders sell spot and buy future to close the basis, BTC demand and USD supply both spike.

Ultimately, this realization of positioning in the market helped us prepare for the impending Great Deleveraging primarily on two fronts. First, we ensured our liabilities had enough duration to support outsized inventory turnover for a sustained period. Second, we amassed the largest sum of reserve assets in our history for the benefit of robust liquidity, particularly with large revolving lines of credit.

Mar 9: Sell Pressure Building

About a week later, it all starts happening. BTC slides below $10k, causing futures to start inching closer to spot pricing. Most of the fund flows pertained to margin calls on this date – even with a relatively lower BTC basis than a few weeks prior, the return was still objectively good enough where cash was still worth borrowing. The first round of margin calls completes smoothly, and our borrowers are headed into the rest of the week with freshly topped up collateral.

Mar 12: “Black Thursday” aka “The Great Deleveraging”

On March 12, BTC began the day trading at about $8k. Over the course of the week, global financial markets saw unprecedented levels of selling with a massive flight to dollars. Essentially every asset in the world was evaluated against holding dollars and the flight to safety was relentless. BTC was no exception. Ultimately, every BTC trade has a person behind it, or a computer trying to figure out where people would be willing to buy or sell. The BTC market is subject to the same emotions and fear humanity faced in this period. When markets are faced with unprecedented adversity, all correlations can rapidly go to one.

As BTC started tanking, the Great Deleveraging introduced in the March 3rd section began coming to fruition. BTC fell below $7k, then $6k, and then by the evening in New York, $5k and soon $4k. A 50% crash in mere hours is significant, even for BTC. There was a vicious cycle of deleveraging because as BTC spot prices fell, futures started unwinding heavily and liquidations on long contracts cascaded the price of futures well below spot. Since a ton of capital was long spot and short future, those positions became highly opportunistic to exit amid the volatility. Unwinding basis positions compounded the spot selling and added more liquidations in futures. The long open interest was annihilated, and the short basis positions flattened up realizing massive profits extremely quickly. All those closures generated cash and created BTC demand.

A phenomenon to note here is many liquid derivatives venues are collateralized in BTC. That means long futures positions are collateralized with the same underlying asset. This can create a major problem if the dollar amount of spot BTC needed to sell at a certain price to cover a derivatives liquidation exceeds the spot liquidity at that price. In other words, consider a variable X which represents the notional amount of spot BTC needed to liquidate given a one dollar drop in futures. Consider a variable Y which represents the notional amount of liquidity in spot BTC at that price. If X/Y < 1 everything is okay, which most of the time is the case. However, if X/Y > 1, liquidations can cascade the price down. When we saw the prints of liquidations on derivatives venues on Thursday evening relative to where spot was trading, the dislodgement was blatantly noticeable.

Traders were scrambling to send margin to exchanges, lenders were refunding collateral to traders, and OTC desks had significant settlement volumes (Genesis’ trading desk for example saw some of the largest OTC volumes since our inception in 2013). The mempool started to get clogged, delaying confirmations. Typically, exchanges don’t care if assets are on the way to the exchange, they only care if they are confirmed and at the exchange. The liquidations were compounded further as traders who had margin ready to go off-platform couldn’t get it to the exchange to meet the requirements of their rapidly falling collateral value.

Mar 13: Immediate Aftermath

The below figure displays the magnitude of cash loans returned to Genesis in the latter half of March: we realized two thirds of the USD loan returns for all of Q1, with the majority concentrated between March 9 and March 19. Over these days everyone on our team stepped up in a big way – risk, originations, operations, legal, and accounting all worked tirelessly to ensure all components of our business operated smoothly. On top of all the previously mentioned flows, clients also started to sell collateral held with us and fresh inventory to our trading desk meaning we had to provide competitive bids across many assets we were sending off our balance sheet. Ultimately, thanks to our team as well as our partners on both spot lending and derivatives liquidity, we were able to support all functions around the clock.

Mar 19: End of Quarter and Near-Term Stabilization

As the market stabilized at the end of the quarter, lending activity normalized and we made the following observations about this tumultuous period:

  • Our client base is well insulated from consumer credit, as they are mostly trading firms which perform extremely well in periods of high volatility.
  • Our business is primarily digital – even a global lockdown does not affect business continuity.
  • Given this innate resilience, we expect a very strong 2020 with growth across originations, outstanding loans, and clients.

Closing Thoughts

Though we are still very much in an uncertain time, we are confident in our ability to weather future periods of extreme market turbulence. Our world class team, top-notch risk management systems, and high caliber, sophisticated client base allows us to scale our lending business well into the future. We hope everyone is staying safe and we look forward to brighter times ahead.


Matt Ballensweig
Vice President
[email protected]

Roshun Patel
[email protected]

To express interest in borrowing or lending,
please fill out the form below

  • Comments: